Sources: U.S. yet to OK aid to Afghanistan after quake

Jonathan Landay

REUTERS

WASHINGTON – Nearly a week after an earthquake killed more than 2,200 people in Afghanistan and left tens of thousands homeless, the United States has not taken the first step to authorize emergency aid, and it was unclear if it plans to help at all, two former senior U.S. officials and a source familiar with the situation told Reuters.

The lack of response by Washington to one of Afghanistan’s deadliest quakes in years underscores how President Donald Trump has forfeited decades of U.S. leadership of global disaster relief with his deep foreign aid cuts and closure of the main U.S. foreign assistance agency, said the source and the former officials.

The State Department on Sept.1 extended its 'heartfelt condolences' to Afghanistan in an X post.

As of Sept.5, however, the State Department had not approved a declaration of humanitarian need, the first step in authorizing U.S. emergency relief, said the former officials, both of whom worked at the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the third source, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.

Such a declaration is usually issued within 24 hours of a major disaster.

The sources said State Department officials had considered recommendations for U.S. disaster aid for Afghanistan. One former senior official said the White House also has considered the issue, but decided against reversing a policy of ending aid to Afghanistan.

The United States was, until this year, the largest aid donor to Afghanistan, where it fought a 20-year war that ended with a chaotic U.S. withdrawal and the Taliban’s seizure of Kabul in 2021. But in April, the Trump administration ended virtually all aid – totaling $562million – to Afghanistan, citing a U.S. watchdog report that humanitarian groups receiving U.S. funds had paid $10.9million in taxes, fees, and duties to the Taliban.

United Nations aid chief Tom Fletcher said the Afghan earthquake was 'the latest crisis to expose the cost of shrinking resources on vital humanitarian work.'

'Massive funding cuts have already brought essential health and nutrition services for millions to a halt; grounded aircraft, which are often the only lifeline to remote communities; and forced aid agencies to reduce their footprint,' he said in a statement on Sept.4.

The Trump administration also has yet to respond to a request by the International Rescue Committee to send $105,000 worth of U.S.-funded medical supplies. The materials include stethoscopes, first aid supplies, stretchers, and other essentials, said Kelly Razzouk, vice president of policy and advocacy for the IRC.

'The stocks are stuck in storage,' said Razzouk, who served on former President Joe Biden’s National Security Council. 'In recent memory, I can’t remember a time when the U.S. did not respond to a crisis like this.'

The IRC needs Washington’s permission to send the equipment because it had been funded by an unrelated U.S. grant that the Trump administration had since canceled.

'Beyond the loss of life, we have also seen basic infrastructure and livelihoods destroyed,' Stephen Rodriguez, a representative for the U.N. Development Program, said Sept.5. He said donations of money, goods, and services have come from Britain, South Korea, Australia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and other countries.